Hi theme coders,
In Piwigo 2.1, theme names are changing:
* "yoga/Sylvia" becomes "Sylvia"
* "gally/graphite" becomes "gally-graphite" (I think, grum please confirm)
In order to have the best possible upgrade script, I would like to perform the best possible mapping between 2.0 user_infos.template and 2.1 user_infos.theme.
Can you please tell me how your theme will be renamed? (before/after)
Offline
Currently for me it's :
floPure/green_nature => Pure_green_nature
floOs/clear => OS_clear
Offline
gally/graphite
- directory : gally-graphite
- name : Gally/Graphite
gally/grum-dark-II
- directory : gally-grum-dark-II
- name : Gally/Grum dark II
gally/lapis-lazuli
- directory : gally-lapis-lapzuli
- name : Gally/Lapis-lazuli
all themes depends of a specific parent theme
- directory : gally-default
Offline
Hi,
good question (since I have not work on the migration yet ...), but I think that it will be: simple/grey → simple
Offline
flop25 wrote:
Currently for me it's :
floPure/green_nature => Pure_green_nature
floOs/clear => OS_clear
What about tr_green_nature theme for floPure?
What about glass, glass_clear, glass_dark and glass_dark_2 themes for floOs?
Offline
P@t wrote:
flop25 wrote:
Currently for me it's :
floPure/green_nature => Pure_green_nature
floOs/clear => OS_clearWhat about tr_green_nature theme for floPure?
What about glass, glass_clear, glass_dark and glass_dark_2 themes for floOs?
well .. the same... it was examples
so
floPure/x => Pure_x
floOs/x=>OS_x
Last edited by flop25 (2010-04-27 23:12:10)
Offline
saimon wrote:
Hi,
good question (since I have not work on the migration yet ...), but I think that it will be: simple/grey → simple
Why not "simple-grey" or "simple-default"?
Because there are another simple themes (simple-white, simple-black, simple-Sunset...)
You can do like grum: simple-default is the parent theme (non-activable).
simple-grey, simple-white, etc... will use simple-default as parent theme.
Offline
P@t wrote:
Why not "simple-grey" or "simple-default"?
Because there are another simple themes (simple-white, simple-black, simple-Sunset...)
You can do like grum: simple-default is the parent theme (non-activable).
simple-grey, simple-white, etc... will use simple-default as parent theme.
I have the idea to add an option dark/clear, maybe one day ...
I don't understand the goal of the "non-activable" option ... derivated theme can inherit from simple and define their theme.css and voilà. This "non-activable" default thing seems like wanting to keep the actual template vs theme scheme but with adifferent directory structure.
But I have not looked yet at the new 2.1 way to make theme, maybe I miss the point.
Offline
saimon wrote:
P@t wrote:
Why not "simple-grey" or "simple-default"?
Because there are another simple themes (simple-white, simple-black, simple-Sunset...)
You can do like grum: simple-default is the parent theme (non-activable).
simple-grey, simple-white, etc... will use simple-default as parent theme.I have the idea to add an option dark/clear, maybe one day ...
I don't understand the goal of the "non-activable" option ... derivated theme can inherit from simple and define their theme.css and voilà. This "non-activable" default thing seems like wanting to keep the actual template vs theme scheme but with adifferent directory structure.
But I have not looked yet at the new 2.1 way to make theme, maybe I miss the point.
Yo do like you want ;-)
But I'll prefer "simple-grey" for the theme name... it's more clear....
Other theme will be named "simple-white", simple-dark", etc... and this themes will use "simple-grey" as parent.
Coded in upgrade process: [Subversion] r5981
Offline