ok
i make a bugtracker for the uploader ?

nicolas wrote:

flop25 wrote:

ok
i make a bugtracker for the uploader ?

Yes or make a plugin ! :-)

+1

:o)

flop25 wrote:

[Bugtracker] ticket 1141 [...] can anyone change in the tittle "updater" by "uploader" ?

done

I've performed a local installion of Shutter tonight. It was very interesting. Shutter has a very little set of features but do them well. It is nice for a small gallery I would say.

What was the most interesting to me is the web uploader. In fact, Shutter uses fancyupload which does not use jQuery but Mootools as JavaScript framework. More specifically you will recognize the showcase Queued Photo Uploader which is quite exactly the same as Shutter implementation. The good news is that fancyupload is under the MIT license :-)

The dynamic sorting is nice too, and the default page layout.

They store the photos like this:

photos
|-- large
|   |-- 1.jpg
|   |-- 2.jpg
|   |-- 3.jpg
|   |-- 4.jpg
|   `-- 5.jpg
|-- medium
|   |-- 1.jpg
|   |-- 2.jpg
|   |-- 3.jpg
|   |-- 4.jpg
|   `-- 5.jpg
|-- original
|   |-- 1.jpg
|   |-- 2.jpg
|   |-- 3.jpg
|   |-- 4.jpg
|   `-- 5.jpg
`-- small
    |-- 1.jpg
    |-- 2.jpg
    |-- 3.jpg
    |-- 4.jpg
    `-- 5.jpg

4 directories, 20 files

The photos are resized during the upload process (I wanted an answer to this specific question).

I have already  suggested that
http://www.uploadify.com/what-is-it/

LucMorizur wrote:

VDigital wrote:

Could we recode a jQuery version of fancyupload?
Do you think so?
Does someone in the team could do it?

(Beginner question : )
Is it a problem to use both JQuery and Mootools (Mootools for the fancyupload, JQuery for all the rest Piwigo already uses) ?

As I said in the french topic, it will be better if we can use a JS uploader which has the same framework the other JS in the webapp use, without losing any feature. It will ease update process and limit the bandwith needed (one framework to load instead of two).