plg wrote:

This demo is not specific to Piwigo.com and I would like to use the same content on http://piwigo.org/demo

I agree mainly the logic of Piwigo.com demo.
But I disagree to be limited on Piwigo.org demo and to have the same content.

Because the goals are different and making the same demo is creating confusion.
I gave more reason details to plg elsewhere.
Behind, my conclusion is the same: please, no.

plg wrote:

* does not try to explain what are the features in Piwigo,
...
What's your opinion about replacing current piwigo.org/demo with this demo?

I have no strong opinion for or against. However I find a bit odd that we don't try to underline existing features. In the end this is what people are looking for when going to a demo ...

tosca wrote:

rvelices wrote:

I find a bit odd that we don't try to underline existing features. In the end this is what people are looking for when going to a demo ...

+1

The Features page also needs an update (if we want people to read it), wouldn't it be good to have some links to the demo (when it's relevant, some features are not "visual" at all) from this page?

In the current demo, there is a category dedicated to describe features (1 sub-category for each feature) and I find it very confusing. mathiasm advised me to add some features description in normal category descriptions. For example, in the Fauna/Mammals category, the description would encourage the visitor to try the "flatten hierarchy" feature to see "Domesticated" and "Wild" mammals at once. I think this is a good compromise.